The International Rafale forum

The international forum about the Dassault Rafale
It is currently Thu May 17, 2012 12:09 am

All times are UTC



Welcome
Welcome to the international Rafale forum

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. In addition, registered members also see less advertisements. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Rafale vs F-16
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:24 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 12:49 pm
Posts: 416
Location: Near Paris (France)
There is a lot to tell about this one...

There have been numerous DACT against the F-16, but only a few reports.

In addition, it's not always been really fine for the Rafale.

For example, when Rafale M F1 were pitted against the greeks F-16 b52, though the results aren't clear, the advantages of Rafale didn't look significant...

Here is a translation by Hyperion (on keypublishing) of an article from this PDF (only relevant parts) :
http://www.interception.gr/app/webroot/ ... RAFALE.pdf
Hyperion wrote:
On the 4vs4 encounter between CdG Rafale and F16 B52+.

This time the french aircrafts also used the trainning function of Spectra, in mild jamming mode, which were immediately detected from the greek aircrafts ECCM, which reply automatically with no pilot input.

The BVR tactics used by the French didn't impress, while they reported all virtual shots as kills.But without wanting to go into detail, observing the route of the target in relation with the lock on it, keeping time (counting) in relation with the virtual launch, the greek pilots managed to arrive to safe conclusions. This time, the majority of the greek shots were inside the "no escape" envelope of AMRAAM, which gave clear advantage to the greek side. The tactic of using data link, where 2 different radars could lock onto 4 aircrafts, taking advantage of the function that the new aircraft gives, made obvious in practice the advantages of the new F16 version. With special tactics planned by our pilots, in quite some cases, they were approaching unobserved opposite to the french aircrafts, a fact that was shown by their reactions.

The success of the greek aircrafts against the Rafale M was afterwards confirmed by comparing the shot reports of the French with the F16 videos, where it was shown that most shots were of low Pk (kill probability).

As a general conclusion, one may say that any Rafale's superiority, in the above scenarios, is marginal, with high kill percentage for the greek side. Also it should be noted that in that period of time, the CdG was cooperating with a greek EMB-145H Erieye with the aim to evaluate the interoperability of the 2 sides. More in detail Link 11 and Link 16 were tested. From the time of take-off from Elefsis airfield, within 10 minutes the greek aircraft had established contact with the french carrier, certifying capability of cooperation in network-centered operations for both sides.


Later, in 2007, Agean Gust :
Quote:
4 Rafale F2 B, 1 Rafale F2 C.


The recent excercise wasn't the first occasion for a HAF squadron to counter the Rafale. In 2006 the Rafale M from CdG partecipated in excercises with F16block52+ and F4E AUP. But the Rafale M of the time, were F1, a version centered in air-to-air role with somewhat limited capabilities. In the Aegean Gust partecipated Rafale F2, with improved air to air capabilities, including the data link between aircrafts of a formation, combined with FSO and data fusion...

... Both greek and french pilots flew as backseaters in each other planes. As for the engagements:

4 sorties occured in the morning and 3 in the evening of Tuesday in 2 vs 2 scenarios, in BVR. The greek aircrafts were B52+. On Wednesday 8 sorties with Rafale B in 2 waves (morning, evening), with the partecipation of 1 french pilot and 4 greek backseaters. This time it was 4 vs 4. The greek aircrafts were B52+, B50D, B30.
Something that appeared strange to the greek pilots, was that while according to the HAF policy the pilots were doing the last pre-takeoff check of their planes (Leak check), the French pilots were taking position on the runway without doing so.

The impressions of the greek pilots were variable, as is natural , and their observations quite interesting. The whole of the greek F16 pilots, found the cockpit particularly functional, although a bit small, as is used in all french aircrafts. Also, the best impressions left the glass cockpit advanced disposition. It is known that the high operational output of the Rafale is result of high performance, excellent behaviour and friendly MMI that adopts to the high workload in multirole missions. The existance of so many displays and the characteristical absense of analog instruments, was natural to make a big impression to the greek pilots, who apart the Falcon's MFDs, are used to analog instruments. Some in fact, told us that they would feel more comfortable, if some analog instruments have been kept as backups in cases of malfunction or failiure of the electric system. Of course it is certain that safety valves has been thought, while evolution indicates that full glass cockpit will dominate in the future, as will happen in the case of F35 too.

It is also natural to be impressed by the high situation awareness provided by the Rafale thanks to data fusion. The Rafale, as the greek pilots had the chance to see, can receive tracking data from RBE2, Spectra, OSF, IFF, MICA IR sensors and accompanying aircrafts, ground command and control facilities and AWACS, elaborate them and produce system tracking data (system tracks). These are superior to quality compared to the single data of the individual sensors. This data is then used for fire control and is shown in the central tactical display and can be transmitted to fellow aircrafts. So, at a glance at the tactical display, the pilots can see the position of targets that may be inside the radar cone or outside and even in the rear hemisphere, no matter if the radar is on or off!

Also, it was verified that OSF provides advantage in air combat. As the greek pilots observed, once the target is locked from the radar, its image is then displayed in the central display which facilitates very much the target identification even in great distances.A similar function is provided in the F16 by the Lantirn Pod in air to air mode, with the difference that the backseater can make a search independent of the radar. On the contrary on the Rafale, the OSF is primarily slaved on the radar.

The best of impressions left to the greek pilots the performace of the Rafale's self protection suite, confirming the french reputation in the sector since the time that HAF operated the ICMS2000 in the Mirage2000.

Small reprimands were made to some small but important details, like the fact of the abscense of a countdown timer in the HUD when a BVR missile is flying towards its target. The greek F16 pilots are used to such an indicator on the lower left of the HUD, indicating the "Time On Target" of the Amraam and the time remaining until the Amraam's autonomous seeker is activated. If the missile fails tracking, then the indication "Loose" appears over the locked target on the HUD and the pilot is aware that the shot has failed. Something like this wasn't found on the Rafale, leading to a difficulty in the interpretation of the BVR shots during the engagements. And this, because the French were regarding that after a certain range , a MICA shot was always successful. As a result, the arrival to safe conclusions, was problematic.

Beyond that, it was also commented positively the agility of the Rafale. Of course the greek pilots still think of the F16 as a particularly capable aircraft in dogfight.
In the air, the Rafale is very agile, but for the greek pilots the sense of flying was very different from that of the F16. It was commented as perfectly stable, with very good response in all speeds and manouvers. Very good impressions were also left by the automatic pilot as well as the ability of maintaining very low speed during approach, prior to landing.

... The Rafale certainly proved that it is a very capable aircraft in the hands of the excellently trainned french pilots who have battle experience. The encounter with F16s, gave the greek pilots the opportunity to measure the F16 capabilities against a 4th gen aircraft, while it showed yet another time that the level of HAF pilots is one of the best in NATO airforces.



He also translated another piece from :
http://www.diplomatia.gr/
Quote:
...The greek pilots were called by their french colleagues as quite aggressive ("vicious") in the air and in no way they were easy targets, neither they reminded F16 pilots of other allied nations with which the Rafale had the chance to partecipate in some other excercises.

According to the french pilots, the Rafale prevailed in the air combat. Initially it was mentioned that in the first missions, the capabilities of the MICA missiles weren't correctly estimated by the opposite team. However, both sides made successful "shots" on the opponents.

The impressions of the greek pilots from the Rafale, were concentrated on the very good situatnio awareness , thanks to link 16 and the big touch screens. These were proved to provide very good image even in conditions of intensive sunshine, which often reduces visibility. In general, the cockpit layout, particularly impresses the greek pilots. Particularly interest also had the use of the Spectra, on the use of which, the french base some of their air tactics that have developed.

As far as the availability of the Rafale goes, in the duration of 18 sorties, it was proved high (94%), while only one flight was delayed and in one more there was a minor technical problem during flight.


If anyone have something else...



More recently, just before Red Flag 08, Rafale went to Luke AFB. According to A&C, they trained against F-16 b42s.

1vs1 and 2vs1 dogfights, a television reporter said that at the end of the day, 6 F-16 were virtually shot down, while 2 Rafale were lost.
An american pilot said that the Rafale is "much more agressive".
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfqJYyPevvw

Here is a video by the SIRPA :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w-4qDLUHvUM

_________________
Have a look at me now ! :lol: (rules)

In case of dispute, put your glasses, then «Duck and cover !» FAS do it !


Top
 Profile  
 
 
 Post subject: Re: Rafale vs F-16
PostPosted: Fri Jul 31, 2009 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:33 am
Posts: 18
As I stated over at F-16.Net (same topic), the Rafale being a better fighter than the thirty plus year old design of the F-16.... is 'not' newsworthy! It would only be newsworthy is the F-16 Blk 52 or 60 was better than the Rafale.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rafale vs F-16
PostPosted: Sat Aug 01, 2009 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:00 am
Posts: 149
Quote:
The impressions of the greek pilots from the Rafale, were concentrated on the very good situatnio awareness , thanks to link 16 and the big touch screens.


This is plain wrong!

The 12F Rafale F1 were never equiped with Link-16; where does these guys get their detailed informations?


Quote:
These were proved to provide very good image even in conditions of intensive sunshine, which often reduces visibility. In general, the cockpit layout, particularly impresses the greek pilots. Particularly interest also had the use of the Spectra, on the use of which, the french base some of their air tactics that have developed.


Well we have an increased number of positive feedback on Rafale MMI, i know of a few "journos" who must be looking at the issue trying to make up a few more legends but i am perplex there, SPECTRA wasn't fully developed nor is it used to its full capabilties even today on the F3; so what's the big deal about it?



AVON wrote:
As I stated over at F-16.Net (same topic), the Rafale being a better fighter than the thirty plus year old design of the F-16.... is 'not' newsworthy! It would only be newsworthy is the F-16 Blk 52 or 60 was better than the Rafale.


Any American forumers like to think that the Rafale is "Inferior"; starting with performances, i just been evicted from strategypage-whatever-forum for telling a few truth (and leaning a few baits which makes me think that there are a lot more pretenders there than "specialists"), but i was more than expecting it.

Trolls have the habbit of jumping up and down (lobbying the mods) making as much noise as possible in their home forums until they get someone banned because they can't cut the mustard and get fragged when they write whatever on subject they can't comprehend fully...

The number of guys pretending to know a little about these subject is enormous in these places, they use them as social forum, they are not necessarly genuine aviation enthusiast and even some big names there are a little biased when it comes to France.

I can remember a guy called LM-Raptor, a good and potent aerodynamicist, still refusing to admit to known facts, having to ressort to denial and spin to make their favourite look good.

But there is yet another issue which helps explaining this, they are all infamiliar with the aerodynamic formulas used in the european fighters and their characteristics, they know theirs nearly by heart (appart for Dwight Looi who only think he knows that is) but when it comes to Delta-canard, they mostly stick to commercials and rough TWR..

The news of Rafale and Pitaine Ruet being rewarded by a board of high ranking RAF and RN official at the RIAT 2009 must have hurt a few egos, but then again in the US even the largest and most popular Military aviation Tatoo is too far away from home to be known and represent any value whatsoever...

Meanwhile, i posted the link to AdA article on Cpt Ruet to Craig Hoyle, Military correspondant for Flight International.
Image
Yes TMor he is seating on the rear seat of a RAF Typhoon!

He is the ONLY authority on the subject at F-I, we spoke by phone a few times, even about the A-Js.

He doesn't share their biased opinions about Rafale, being a true enthusiast and specialist and told me that where these other guy were writing, they weren't part of F-I editorial team, only of the sister Edition Flight Dayly.

Flight Dayly uses F-I website, obviously confusing a few forumers into thinking that the article they can read there is coming straight from Flight International, this is not the case.

Well, Craig said BRAVO (en Francais dans le texte) to the AdA Rafale team in his email to me.

Now about the topic subject:

When F-16 came into service i was still developing my aerodynamics and overal knowlege base but when i saw it competing vs Mirage F-1 and Saab JAS 37 Viggen at Le Bourget (where i took my BIA succesfully btw) i could see that it was way superior to anything else in terms of maneuvrability.

At the time i felt desapointed about the Mirage F1 prestation but thaught of F-16 as a stroke of genius, i still think it was despite a few design flaws...

Rafale is that kind of aircraft; its aerodynamics are superior to anything i have seen so far, so Dassault-Aviation have the best platfom they could wish for.

Developing its potential with new systems is another matter but i think DGA and the gouvernement know its growth potential and are willing to sustain the effort, which is the best thing that could happen for France today.

We owe Dassault designers and inges a very loud MERCI because it took some to pull that one of the hat, now it is the turn of the systems designers and DGA for further technologic developement...

SNECMA for one have the grass cut from under their feets with the US having problems with F-135 and F-136 still uncertain today.

Not necessary a good thing because we need more power and lower SFC from M88 and in France we can release the effort when it is too easy, look at the Rugby team...

I think, personaly that a 55 kN/85 kN M 88 setting would be ideal in French forces service, wait and see what we'll get in the future...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aIwNMmIP20c
A very impressive display by this Dutch F-16, he equals that of Cpt Ruet in that he also pulls a -3 g turn...

Congrats!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rafale vs F-16
PostPosted: Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:58 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 3:33 am
Posts: 18
Some people don't want to be confused by the truth.

Quote:
Wingman
Any American forumers like to think that the Rafale is "Inferior"; starting with performances, i just been evicted from strategypage-whatever-forum for telling a few truth (and leaning a few baits which makes me think that there are a lot more pretenders there than "specialists"), but i was more than expecting it.

In all fairness to some of these flamers (one time only), part of this was brought on by some of the Dassault. In an interview before the Rafale or Typhoon were operational made the statement, the Rafale was deliberately made less than optimum in order to make a better 'Omni-role' aircraft! That was the first time I heard the term omni-role. The word "Omni-role" is used instead of fighter-bomber on the official website.... at least for a while.
I remember at F-16.Net there were people who felt the F-16C Block 42 was the equal of the Su-30MKI. After COPE INDIA 2005, the zealots continued until some posted a picture of an F-16 smiling for the Su-30's gun camera! One F-16 pilot (who had a friend of whom participated in that COPE INDIA) responded to that post by saying, there is not much an F-16 could do to against an F-16!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rafale vs F-16
PostPosted: Fri Aug 14, 2009 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:00 am
Posts: 149
Quote:
"AVON"]Some people don't want to be confused by the truth.


Confusion comes first from ignorance, it is always difficult to admit to it and in the US it is something of a standard when it comes to French aircrafts and weapons.


Quote:
In an interview before the Rafale or Typhoon were operational made the statement, the Rafale was deliberately made less than optimum in order to make a better 'Omni-role' aircraft!

I don't know who at Dassault-Aviation could have made such a statement but I know for sure that the design points of the aircrafts were always optimized for maximum performances in the A2A role.

The fact that Dassault designers were good enough to make of it the best strike aircraft of its generation is another matter; it doesn't change the design points nor its performances.

For years, we had some forum "Gurus" rewriting Rafale politico-industrial history in some other forums, using this "gray area" as a basis, pretending for example, that its aerodynamics were compromised for navalisation.

They were trying to imply de-facto, that MN requirements had been more important than those of the primary customer (AdA) which always was for STOL performances and high maneuvrability for the Air-to-Air role.

It is true that the Defense Minister was trying to harmonize the programs of both services but MN was much more independent to National manufacturers and looking at US aircrafts as well as domestic solutions while AdA were writing the requirements books for Dassault.

In fact, AdA STOL requirements were much older than the ACX program and lead to researches in this field early in the 70's after experiments on Mirage IIIs (Milan) and VTOL derivatives were dumped.
http://www.dassault-aviation.com/en/pas ... n.html?L=1
http://www.dassault-aviation.com/en/pas ... v.html?L=1

The Mirages G, F1 and F2 are the direct results of these requirements for better STOL performances, so are the Mirage IIIs and IAI Kfir...
http://www.dassault-aviation.com/en/pas ... g.html?L=1


Quote:
After COPE INDIA 2005, the zealots continued until some posted a picture of an F-16 smiling for the Su-30's gun camera! One F-16 pilot (who had a friend of whom participated in that COPE INDIA) responded to that post by saying, there is not much an F-16 could do to against an F-16!


That's typical of a US forum, one can read the most interesting things but also the least informed when it comes to other (Non-US) aircrafts, the US pilots who first came across a Rafale all had a nasty surprise because no one was expecting it to be so performant.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
suspicion-preferred